Editorial Standards

Author Guidelines

A refined editorial framework for original scholarship in law and socio-legal studies, designed to support rigorous, transparent and internationally recognised legal research.

No matching guideline section was found.
01 — Editorial Scope

Scope and Aims

Veritas Legalis publishes original, previously unpublished scholarly work in law and socio-legal studies.

The journal welcomes rigorous contributions including doctrinal analysis, comparative law, empirical legal research, and law and policy commentary. Submissions must make a clear scholarly contribution and must not be under review by another journal or publication outlet at the time of submission.

Editorial principle. Manuscripts should demonstrate intellectual originality, methodological clarity, legal accuracy, and a meaningful contribution to contemporary legal scholarship.
02 — Submission Categories

Manuscript Types and Length

Word limits apply to the manuscript as specified below. Authors should observe the prescribed range before submission.

Manuscript Type Word Limit Footnotes
Full Research Article 6,000–10,000 words Included in overall count; maximum c. 25% of body text
Review Article 4,000–6,000 words As above
Case Note / Commentary 2,500–4,000 words As above
Book Review 1,000–1,500 words Minimal

Word counts include footnotes but exclude the abstract, keywords, and bibliography.

03 — Manuscript Presentation

General Formatting

Paper size A4
Margins 2.54 cm (1 inch) on all sides
Body font Times New Roman, 12 pt
Footnotes Times New Roman, 10 pt
Body spacing 1.5 line spacing
Footnotes & block quotations Single spacing
Alignment Justified
Paragraphs First-line indentation of 1.27 cm; no additional spacing between paragraphs within the same section
File format Microsoft Word (.docx); PDF for reference only
Page numbers Bottom centre, throughout
Language British English, applied consistently throughout

For spelling and usage, authors should use the Oxford English Dictionary as the reference standard. Examples include organisation, labour, and analyse.

04 — Blind Peer Review

Title Page

The title page must be submitted separately from the main manuscript to preserve the integrity of blind peer review.

  • Full title, maximum 20 words, bold, 16 pt and centred.
  • Full name(s) of author(s).
  • Institutional affiliation.
  • ORCID iD, where available.
  • Corresponding author's email address.
  • Short running title, maximum 8 words.
  • Word count excluding abstract, keywords and references.
  • Acknowledgements and funding statement, where applicable.
  • Conflict of interest declaration.
Anonymisation requirement. The main manuscript must contain no author-identifying information. Self-citations should be anonymised where necessary, for example as “Author (2023)”, and identifying document metadata should be removed.
05 — Abstract & Keywords

Abstract

The abstract should be between 150 and 250 words and written as a single paragraph in English.

It should contain no citations and should not use sub-headings. The structure should implicitly communicate the background or problem, research objective or question, methodology, principal findings or argument, and implication or conclusion.

Use the past or present tense as appropriate. First-person plural (“we”) should generally be avoided unless appropriate to multi-authored empirical research.

Keywords

Provide exactly five keywords or short phrases, separated by semicolons. Keywords should be arranged alphabetically or by relevance and placed immediately below the abstract.

06 — Scholarly Architecture

Structure of the Article

Authors should use a logical and transparent structure. The following sequence is recommended:

  1. Introduction — problem statement, research question, significance and structure.
  2. Literature Review / Legal Framework — may be merged into the Introduction for shorter pieces.
  3. Research Methodology — research type, approach, data and sources.
  4. Discussion / Analysis — substantive analysis divided into thematically titled sections.
  5. Conclusion and Recommendations.
  6. Bibliography / List of References.
  7. Appendices, where necessary.

6.1 Heading Levels and Numbering

Use a decimal numbering system and do not normally exceed three numbered heading levels.

1. Introduction
   2.1 Historical Development
   2.2 Comparative Perspectives
     2.2.1 The United Kingdom
     2.2.2 Indonesia
3. Discussion
4. Conclusion
Level Style Example
Heading 1 Bold, 14 pt, numbered 1. Introduction
Heading 2 Bold, 12 pt, numbered 1.1 Background
Heading 3 Bold italic, 12 pt, numbered 1.1.1 Statutory Basis

Avoid a fourth numbered level. Further subdivision should use unnumbered run-in italic phrases.

07 — Typographical Style

Emphasis: Bold, Italics and Underlining

Bold

Bold should be reserved for the article title, principal headings, and, sparingly, key terms at first use in a definitional sentence.

Italics

Italics should be used for:

  • foreign-language and Latin legal terms, such as ratio decidendi, obiter dictum, ultra vires;
  • case names in text and citations;
  • titles of books and journals in citations; and
  • genuine emphasis, used sparingly.

Underlining

Underlining is not used in ordinary body text. It is reserved for statutory or draft-legislation extracts where it conventionally indicates proposed insertions.

Capitalisation

ALL CAPITALS should generally be avoided except for defined acronyms after their full form has first been introduced.

08 — Quotation Practice

Quotations

Quotations of fewer than 40 words should be incorporated into the text in double quotation marks, with single quotation marks for a quotation within a quotation.

Quotations of 40 words or more should appear as an indented block, with a 1.27 cm indentation, single spacing and 11 pt type. Quotation marks should not be used.

Any alteration to a quotation must be identified using square brackets or an ellipsis in square brackets, such as [...].

09 — Legal Citation

Citation Style and Footnotes

OSCOLA, 4th edition, is the recommended citation standard.

Legal scholarship should use footnotes rather than author-date citations, following the Oxford Standard for the Citation of Legal Authorities (OSCOLA) or another jurisdiction-appropriate equivalent where expressly required.

General Rules

  • Footnote markers appear after punctuation.
  • Footnotes are numbered consecutively throughout the article.
  • Each footnote ends with a full stop.
  • Pinpoint citations follow the principal citation, preceded by a comma.
  • Subsequent citations use an abbreviated form or ibid. where appropriate.
  • op. cit. and loc. cit. should not be used.

Illustrative Formats

Source Type Illustrative Format
Book AuthorFirstname Surname, Title of Book (Edition, Publisher Year) page.
Journal article AuthorFirstname Surname, 'Title of Article' (Year) Volume Journal Abbreviation FirstPage, PinpointPage.
UK case Case Name [Year] Court Citation.
Neutral citation Case Name [Year] Court Number, [Paragraph].
Statute Short Title of Act Year, s [section number].
EU legislation Regulation/Directive (EU) No/Year, [Year] OJ L pinpoint.
Online source Author, 'Title' (Website, Date) <URL> accessed Date.
10 — References

Bibliography / List of References

The bibliography should appear at the end of the article and should be headed “Bibliography” or “List of References”.

Entries should be arranged alphabetically by author surname, followed chronologically for multiple works by the same author.

Recommended Categories

  1. Books
  2. Journal Articles
  3. Legislation / Statutes
  4. Case Law / Court Decisions
  5. International Instruments / Treaties
  6. Online Sources / Reports
Reference expectations. A minimum of approximately 40 references is commonly expected for substantial research articles, with an appropriate proportion of recent peer-reviewed journal literature. Self-citation should remain proportionate and should not ordinarily exceed approximately 15% of the reference list.
11 — Visual Materials

Tables and Figures

  • Number tables and figures consecutively.
  • Place concise captions above tables.
  • Place figure captions below figures.
  • Refer explicitly to each table or figure before it appears.
  • Provide a source line beneath reproduced or adapted material.
  • Use Times New Roman 11 pt and single spacing within tables.
Table 1 — Comparative Legal Framework

Figure 1 — Conceptual Model of the Proposed Analysis
12 — Language & Terminology

Transliteration, Non-English Terms and Abbreviations

Non-English legal terms retained in the original language should be italicised at each occurrence unless they have become naturalised English usage or are otherwise governed by house style.

Abbreviations and acronyms should be written in full at first mention, followed by the abbreviation in parentheses. The abbreviation may then be used consistently thereafter.

Statutory and case abbreviations should follow the Cardiff Index to Legal Abbreviations where applicable.

13 — British Editorial Style

Numbers, Dates and Punctuation

  • Spell out numbers one to nine; use numerals for 10 and above, except at the beginning of a sentence.
  • Use dates in the format 5 September 2026.
  • Use single quotation marks as the default convention.
  • Use double quotation marks for a quotation within a quotation where required by the house style.
  • Use the Oxford comma sparingly and consistently.
  • Use the percentage symbol with numerals, for example 45%.
  • Use an en dash for number ranges and an em dash for parenthetical breaks.
14 — Integrity & Transparency

Research Ethics and Declarations

Authors should provide appropriate declarations concerning the ethical conduct and transparency of their research.

  • Research ethics compliance statement, particularly for empirical or human-subjects research.
  • Conflict of interest declaration.
  • Funding acknowledgement, including funding body and grant number where applicable.
  • Data availability statement where empirical data underpin the analysis.
Research integrity. Authors remain responsible for the accuracy, originality, legality and ethical integrity of their submissions.
15 — Final Verification

Peer Review and Submission Checklist

Complete the following checks before submitting your manuscript.

Submission readiness 0 / 10 completed
Final note. A similarity or plagiarism check should be completed before submission. As a general editorial benchmark, a similarity index below 20% may be appropriate, subject to legitimate quotations, references and the journal's specific policy.